Animal liberation front compilation nurse with wound

Animal liberation front compilation nurse with wound archive#
Animal liberation front compilation nurse with wound free#

Megastealer 02:39, 17 August 2007 (UTC) I don't see how this article could be improved by mentioning photographs. Ferrylodge 02:15, 17 August 2007 (UTC) Although I would like to insert the following sentence into the article, I'm not sure where to put it: 'Photos of aborted fetuses are available on the internet from organizations such as Priests for Life and the Center for Bio-Ethical Reform.' Does anyone have an opinion about that? Ferrylodge 02:38, 17 August 2007 (UTC) I assure you that none of us would have any trouble obtaining the rights for such an image. I am not aware that Wikipedia has further articles about organizations which make such pictures available via internet. Let's instead write: 'Photos of aborted fetuses are available on the internet from pro-life organizations such as Priests for Life and the Center for Bio-Ethical Reform.' Any objections? By all means, we can also footnote whatever texts you please, as well as providing further relevant links. Next, it is unencyclopedic to mention talk page discussion in the main article space (and is that even an accurate summary of why there are no pictures of aborted fetuses?) Next why direct people to pro-life websites? Why not, hypothetically speaking, equally say 'please refer to a graduate level medical text on obstetrics/gynecology.'? So yes, I object to that proposal.- AndrewВ c 02:03, 17 August 2007 (UTC) You have some good points there, but so do I. Such photos are, however, available on the internet from pro-life organizations such as Priests for Life and the Center for Bio-Ethical Reform.' Any objections? Ferrylodge 01:20, 17 August 2007 (UTC) First of all, there is no reason for disclaimers, per Wikipedia:No disclaimers in articles. Such as: 'Photos of aborted fetuses are not included in this article primarily because inclusion requires consensus. This article could be improved by mentioning photographs. Hope this helps.- AndrewВ c 01:17, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Animal liberation front compilation nurse with wound free#

So if you have any free content, or have either the access to photograph a procedure, or the artistic skills and knowledge to accurately draw diagrams, please feel free to bring proposals here to talk. ask yourself, which one is more encyclopedic?). I mean, just about anyone with a camera can take a picture of genitalia, but not many people can take a picture of an abortion procedure (I also think it may be good to have an illustration of the actual medical procedure, instead of just a bloody photo. There simply aren't many (or any) free images of abortion. Furthermore, another issue is wikipedia's image use policy. Instead, specific consensus needs to be raised on each talk page of the article prior to including said graphic content. Wikipedia policy concerning graphic images isn't a 'other crap exists' sort of thing, where other articles' content should be used as rationale for the rest of wikipedia.

Animal liberation front compilation nurse with wound archive#

IronAngelAlice 00:34, 17 August 2007 (UTC) Perhaps an image of an abortion at each trimester? Megastealer 02:44, 17 August 2007 (UTC) First of all, this topic has extensively been covered in the past, if you'd look at the archive box there are some links to past discussions. The photo isn't sensational, so I do not have faith that it will satisfy your desire to 'display' an abortion. This is a link to the abortion of an 8 week fetus provided by the Medical Library at the University of Utah. Eight weeks is around the average stage at which women seek an abortion. Should we include pictures of late term abortions where the fetus is extremely deformed as the result of abnormalities (and wouldn't have been viable outside the womb) warning - this link is to a medical website with a photo of a herniated fetus? At what stage of gestation should the picture of the abortion be? Surely, we can't clutter the page by having all the stages of gestation represented. Why is the same thing not done for abortion, the ultimate result of a penis and vagina? Could the 'editor consensus' be hiding something from the public? Megastealer 23:03, 16 August 2007 (UTC) This raises interesting questions. On articles such as penis and vagina, nice graphical pictures are displayed to show exactly what a penis and vagina are. 14 Womb-Uterus debate: central location proposed.11 Just the US, or is abortion 'safer' in other countries as well.5 Proposal to change 'Health effects' to 'Health effects of abortion on women'.4 Safer than childbirth or safer for women than childbirth.